Big EXE size diff between KOL 2.09 and 2.10

← →
Dodfr (2005-07-12 03:10) [0]

Same source compiled with 2.10 = 199KB, 2.09 = 171KB, that is nearly 30KB more :-(

← →
Владимир Кладов (2005-07-12 05:02) [1]

check Variants, Sysutils, ActiveX or othen VCL units in USES. KOL could NOT give such big size increase itself.

← →
Dodfr (2005-07-12 12:34) [2]

As I did not changed the project sources between two compilation I did a second test :

I deleted kol.dcu and mirror.dcu files, installed 2.00 + 2.09 update, started MirrorKOLPackageD6.dpk and compiled my project, then re-delete dcu files re-installed 2.10, re-compiled :

2.09 -> 175.104 bytes
2.10 -> 203.264 bytes

Same difference...

← →
Dodfr (2005-07-12 14:02) [3]

Both RCDATA PACKAGEINFO resource show same imported units.

← →
Dodfr (2005-07-14 14:32) [4]

Amazing, I re-tested to activate map files to compare them and now both 2.09 and 2.10 give me 164KB size when it was now 190KB before I re-compile again KOL package.

Cool :-) but I don"t understand why.

I keep the 3 map files for further analyse but diffline show many different lines and I don"t know what are important ones to check.

Big EXE size diff between KOL 2.09 and 2.10 Найти похожие ветки